It’s hard to ignore the tension as the world hold it’s collective breath for the outcome of a meeting in Copenhagen on December 9-12 when the parties of
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) meet for the last time on government level before the Kyoto climate agreement must be renewed (In 2012 the Kyoto Protocol to prevent climate changes and global warming expires). Governmental representatives from 170 countries are expected to convene at the Bella Center as well as over 8000 others from governmental representatives, NGO’s, journalists and concerned people.
This is a HUGE issue. The conclusion of the meeting will be the Copenhagen Protocol to prevent global warming and climate changes. It will affect you and me and all generations to come, very directly.

Floods in the Philippines – proof of climate change?
It’s not just me that is worried. A survey of world wide views on global warming polled 4,400 citizens of 38 countries revealed that 91% thought the climate situation very urgent. It is a huge relief that the human race is finally aware that there is a climate problem.
The way I see it there are two HUGE issues.
Should the worlds economies focus primarily on
1. Emissions reductions ie. Kick the carbon addiction
or
2. Climate change adaptation Ie. Find a way to live with climate change
According to the World Wide views on global warming 58% of citizens of industrial nations believe that between green house gas emissions should be reduced by 25 – 50%.

At the Copenhagen ClimateCouncil earlier this year, the president of the United Nations Ban Ki Moon said “We know that the safest way of reducing climate risks is to reduce emissions. We know that taking early action makes good business sense. And we know the cost of inaction will be much bigger that the cost of inaction now”.
But yet fewer people from developing nations though that they should face the same emissions reductions. The problem is that if low income countries agree to lower gas emissions they will be unable to develop at a desirable pace or to the standards they aspire to. They also cannot afford the cost of climate change adaptations.
But Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UN Environment Program Executive Director says that cutting green house gases will not be enough. And Prof. Lu?ka Kajfež Bogataj from the University of Ljubljana agrees with him. On the Climate Thinkers Blog she says that the problem may be worse than we think “Deep down some of the scientists believe that we will soon be surprised to learn that the global climate change impact has been under estimated and that we will recognize that the climate change cost is even higher than was estimated”.
So my question is this. Do we humans really have the will to deal with climate change?
Well there’s a lot of shouting and yelling going on and activists are screaming for governments to agree to emissions controls.It feels good and people are being asked to make personal commitments to reduce their carbonf ootprint by 10%.
But do we really comprehend the scale of personal sacrifices that are needed for us to avert the consequences of climate change?
In this list what would you be willing to do?
- Live in cold houses through the winter
- Forgo air conditioning in the summer
- Sell your car and use only public means or walk to get about
- Eat much much less,
- Be a vegan
- Never travel on holiday again
Let’s face it, we are addicted to comfort – kicking the carbon habit = suffering. It aint gonna happen, most humans aren’t masochists.
As one very smart person said to me yesterday “we are constantly seeking to earn more so that we can live more comfortably, Americans will not change their way of life for climate change. Nor will they respond to the impacts of climate change which are already affecting poor countries“. The American who said this to me is a teenager. That scares me.
I am currently in Boston where it’s very cold outside and it’s toasty warm indoors – so warm that it’s delicious. I just don’t see people agreeing to be cold – it’s dangerous for our bodies and makes us grouchy.
Grouchy angry people are unpleasant to be around, but hungry starving people are dangerous
From what I’ve seen in Africa, I personally believe that the impacts of climate change will lead to civil conflicts, wars, and genocide.
Imagine what its like being a parstoralist in Northern Kenya where it has not rained for 3 years. Your cattle are starving and dying all around you. All your wealth could be gone in days unless you find grass and water. Your children are sickly and dying too – you watch them go for days with out eating. They don’t complain. Your wife is dehydrated, she cannot even produce tears when the youngest dies. You bury him in a shallow grave, you are too weak to dig any deeper. The sun is burning your skin but there is no shade, you are weak but you must keep moving in search of grass to keep the few emaciated cattle alive. You don’t care that you are in other peoples land, that they are armed and have threatened to kill you. You know that there will be a bloody battle so you carry a gun and you are ready to use it. You have armed your children and your wife too. This is a life or death struggle, you will do anything to stay alive and feed your family.
Sound fictional? It’s happening in Kenya right now watch this BBC video about drought conflict and elephants
The Copenhagen Treaty tries to address the immediate impact of climate change on developing nations and on page 122 it says
17. [[Developed [and developing] countries] [Developed and developing country Parties] [All Parties] [shall] [should]:]
(a) Compensate for damage to the LDCs’ economy and also compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity, as many will become environmental refugees;
(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably compensated for environmental, social and economic losses arising from the implementation of response measures.
First let me tell you I HATE LEGALESE.
But what worries me more is that this language sounds like socialism and I’m afraid it is a red flag to the capitalists (who happen to currently rule planet earth). If you’ve been following the health care debate in USA you’ll know what I mean. Comments on the Coyote blog confirm my worst fears about lack of empathy by some American people towards other non Americdans. All I can say is that these people frighten me.
It’s hard not to feel despair for the planet. I feel especially pained because climate change is affecting me. Kenyans are dying of starvation in a drought caused largely to climate change yet the countries that are mostly responsible for the climate change have not responded adequately to appeals and the WHO warns that only 10% of required food is available to feed 10 million starving people. I feel powerless to do anything to save my people. I know that suffering is already fueling conflicts.
Maybe it’s just me but I get the feeling that the countries attending the Copenhagen meeting are doing so with heavy hearts, the decisions at hand are very tough and will necessarily be painful. It’s as if to survive we have to chop off our limbs – otherwise we will slowly boil, and everything will be affected, oceans, soil, water, people, the air we breathe, wildlife and nature in general..
I’ve met many young people who believe it’s too late, we’re too greedy, too slow and too selfish.
But we cannot despair, it paralyses us. We are the thinking ape, LETS THINK up some solutions!
You can Help us!
We are inviting 30 guest bloggers to give us their views, their experiences, and to share their 3 big ideas in the run up to Copenhagen. If you would like to contribute please send me an email paula@wildlifedirect.org subject My Planet
For a great guide to Copenhagen visit the Climate Feedback Blog






6 Comments
My dear Paula i think your intentions are good but i am afraid you have been badly mislead. Let me explain.
Firstly as i ecologist i expect you to have the views that you have because you live with nature all the time and you see it dying of specie after specie.
This i agree is bad but for many species is inevitable. You see trying to stop human enchroachment or species dying is like trying to stop the a river from bursting its banks after long rains. Its a very hard task that you cannot win.
What is my answer? As a sociologist i think your biggest asset is people. We have to empower people and this can be done using 3 things
Energy
Technology
Education
1.Energy
You see the problem is that Africans dont have energy. They have land but they dont have any mechanization tools to use to till this land and get good yields.
As a result they resort to cutting and burning trees(firewood) This bad number 1 because it depletes forests and also destroys the habitat that you care about.
2.TECHNOLOGY
The solution is this we have the largest coal reserves in the world here in Kenya. We should exploit clean coal technologies and allow farmers and homes to access the coal.
This will develop the country at a rapid rate because it would provide incentives for Government and Private sector to build COAL routes across the country to every household.
This coal routes will also be the same routes Trains, Trams, Cars and Fibre optics will use.
This will also give forest breathing space and alot of food(CO2) and people will be richer and more able to plant trees in their homes and visit your parks and zoos to enjoy the environment (Hungry people cannot do so)
As it currently stands the Kenya Conservation efforts are just blocking development and blocking development is killing the wildlife slowly but surely.
Climate Change issue is being used to serve the agenda of the west. I bet you India/China axis will refuse to adopt their proposals in toto.
Thanks though for your caring for the environment but people must come first.
How is Climate Change being used to serve the agenda of the west? Climate Change affects all the citizens of the world. I welcome you to come and see the affects of it in Australia. Everything is the fault of the West! Just ask Robert Mugabe! I would think that if African leaders put a stop to greed and corruption, then then would be a lot more equity on the African continent. That is not the fault of the west. Also, women need to be empowered and emancipated. If they have control over their bodies, their lives and have equal rights, many things will change around the world. That will be a big bonus for the environment.
@Brenton thanks for responding but i think you are being emotional for no reason.
The climate change that is happening is because of the wests history of exploiting resources worldwide for their own benefit.
How climate change serves the agenda of the west is because all AID packages that will be imposed on Africa will force the continent to use so called sustainable energy.
This energies include wind energy which has a much higher carbon footprint then nuclear energy and is not even realible.
As pointed out earlier in Kenya we have the largest reserves of coal yet because of proposed rules in the Copehagen treaty we shall not be allowed to use this resource to develop our country. This will be done by imposing a tax on Kenyan commodities which are produced using so called green technologies.
Countries like Britain developed their households PPP by using coal as a localized home energy source. We as Kenyans reserve the right to use this energy source and we must agree to this at Copenhagen.
Environmentalists like the author of this post are sadly in my opinion being used to advance this agenda.
If you want to mitigate climate change in australia plant trees and wait for this period of sunflares to subside.
Climate change is after all cyclical.
Sorry i have made a few typos. I meant to say the Kenyan products that are not produced using so called green technologies will be taxed by Europe.
This is unfair because using the same logic we should backdate taxes for all european products that have entered Africa that have not been produced using Green technologies. This is offcource impossible.
Another thing is European and America companies hold the Patents to this green technologies and therefore they will control this market when we are forced to adopt this technologies.
Lastly wind farms have a very high carbon footprint because each wind tower needs at least 1km of tarmac road built to sustain it. Furthermore WIndfarms are located in far flung areas and require billions of dollars to install. Their power yield is also lower than say nuclear energy hence unreliable.
I recommend a following power mix for Kenya.
25% Nuclear
15% Hydroelectric
10% Coal (Domestic use)
25 Geothermal
25 Solar
Hi John – I totally understand your comments about coal in Kenya but I think you are horribly wrong. If Kenya had such huge reserves we would be exploiting them (or someone would) – when I was at Lafarge (Bamburi) we looked at these coal reserves – it’s dirty coal, poor quality and too expensive to extract. Lafarge is instead growing plantations of trees for alternative fuel. I agree with Brenton that we can’t ‘blame’ the west for everything – it is’nt a productive approach. For those climate change skeptics I fear history will prove them wrong, selfish and it will not be worth the regrets. We can’t really expect that our actions on the planet will not alter it … in my short life time I’ve seen HUGE changes already. We don’t have time to play around, experiment and make mistakes anymore. I fear we’ve been too much of ‘greedy apes’ and we’ve got to get smart. We’re capable but sometimes we fall into traps of sillyness – as painful as it is for some of us, we’ve got to be humble – we can’t afford to lose this beautiful blue planet.
Firstly i havent blamed the west for everthing that is the defense shield that westerners use whenever we point out their mistakes. I have correctly allocated blame with regards to their exploitative policies in africa that empower our corrupt leaders.
Africans are starting from a point of weakness and sometimes ignorance which is a recipe for chaos.
I got a different report on the coal but let me give you that.
But how do you reconcile the point that our populations are growing and eventually wildlife will have to give life to humans.
My solution is to dramatically increase energy supply in the mix i identified including 10% coal so as too reduce stress on the environment otherwise we will all be fighting a losing battle.
One Trackback
[...] So here is the list of things would you be willing to do: [...]