KWS gives up Amboseli
Category: National Parks and protected areas | Date: May 29 2008 | By: baraza
For some reason this hasn’t hit the mainstream press, but according to the East African newspaper, the KWS have given up Amboseli National Park.This story goes back to 2005 when the president in his wisdom gave away the reserve to the local Maasai in what many believe was an attempt to buy support for constitutional referendum. They accepted the land which overlooks Mt Kilimanjaro, and voted against him anyway.
Local NGO’s Nature Kenyaand Eastern African Environmental Network took the government to court to squash the ministers decision to actually gazette the presidents declaration. The case is still in court. Despite this KWS have apparently given up and the newspaper claim that they have a copy of an agreement to that effect. It seems that the agreement puts KWS in a contracted position to manage the park on behalf of the council who can boot them out if they are not happy.
Why does this matter?
Amboseli is iconic of Kenyas’ wildlife protection and conservation success. It is one of the most important protected areas in Kenya - and the combined attraction of mountain and elephants generates more revenues than most of the others combined! It is where the elephants and lions have recently been speared. The local council is unlikely to have relevant competence to manage the site and Kenya may lose one of its greatest and most famous wildlife refuges.
It’s not surprising that the locals want the land, KWS has been raking in millions for years, with little to show for its contribution to the local communities. Nevertheless, this decision is likely to see the invasion of the park by pastoralists, the killing of elephant and lions and tourism is unlikely to recover.
I suspect that this is the beginning of something interesting, KWS releasing a stranglehold on parks and reserves especially where communities are ferocious (they are very averse to aggression). They will let go back down and take on managerial roles only - like the private sector. Can KWS survive this way? I’m curious - it is quite a bloated organization.
I wonder what would happen if we engaged more private sector interest in conservation directly (not just hotels) in Kenya that way Kenyans could invest in wildlife and nature protection and earn dividends.
……perhaps I”m dreaming again.
Tags: Amboseli, Kenya, Kenya Wildlife Service, KWS
Facebook Cause: WildlifeDirect 


15 Responses to “KWS gives up Amboseli”
sheryl, washington dc, on 29 May 2008
Interesting - maybe, but a disaster for the wildlife and the ecosystems? Definitely.
That’s about enough really bad news for one day.
s.
Wanda, Atlanta, on 29 May 2008
All bad news — world over — sad state of affairs for wildlife!
bushmeateastafrica, on 29 May 2008
This makes me curious. There is more than meets the eye!
Mwenja
Jan, on 29 May 2008
This is devastating news for Amboseli. The Maasai themselves have admitted they don’t have the knowledge or capability of running the biosphere park. They have for years been killing the elephants and lions. I stay there for a week every February and a week every August and have seen the speared elephants on numerous occasions. Last year not only did they kill a pride of lions, but also clubbed the cubs to death.
If this is true thousands of people will be moving into the area to try and get a piece of the financial pie, leaving even less room for wildlife.
Not only will they be able to put KWS out whenever they wish, but they will also be able to “blackmail” the lodges and if they don’t get the money the want put them out also.
Let’s hope that the court case will not be cancelled and that saner minds will prevail.
TheTeach, Seattle, on 29 May 2008
Is there anything good to report? How can KWS just walk away from Amboseli? Who’s going to protect the elephants? I’ll be most anxious to hear what Dr. Leakey, Cynthia Moss and Joyce Poole have to say regarding this matter. These elephants are acclamated to humans and are part of a longterm study group and must be protected, perhaps above many other parks in other parts of the country. To leave this ecosystem vulnerable now, when bushmeat and elephant poaching across the continent are on the rise, is just insane. Perhaps an international conservation group could be invited in to provide additional resources to assist the Maasai in protecting the reserve and insure the tribe benefits financially from its stewardship and tourism links. Clearly, Kenya has some serious internal issues to sort out presently, but the wildlife is the natural heritage of all Kenyans. You’d think all Kenyans could agree on that and make that the mandate for permanant protection of Amboseli by KWS. Keep us posted and let the bloggers know what we can do to help preserve Amboseli from the fates and the furies.
Daniel, on 30 May 2008
Baraza–
You are not dreaming at all, if you are, your dreams are for good fortune for Kenya, the Maasai, tourists and our wildlife. It’s been a long time coming for such innovative ideas that not only benefit the communities surrounding the game parks and reserves but also to provide critical resources for sustainability and conservation. There is a huge potential in the value chain enhancement and diversification in the tourism sector outside the traditional hotels and safari tours. Good dreams.
Daniel Mutai
Oklahoma, USA
Joanne - UK, on 02 Jun 2008
This is extremely disturbing news especially with the increase in killings recently, a wildlife disaster can be foreseen.
Colleen, on 02 Jun 2008
of course I know nothing but will put it out there that the story of this organic clothing guy was inspiring and an example of how private sector helped people and wildlife? More of these ventures .. wrestle Kenya out of the hands of greedy international corporations in bed with government who just want to pillage
check this fellow out.
http://www.wildlifeworks.com
pretty inspiring success story in Kenya
He might have some ideas too, i.e., the dude that runs it.
Daniel, on 02 Jun 2008
Colleen,
Thanks for sharing that link. It’s quite a success story. I hope the rest of the conservancies are ready and receptive to this innovative idea.
I am travelimg to Kenya from the USA in December with young university students interested in community development and I hope we visit this site in Rukinga. Our website link is below.
http://www.africamattersinternational.org/
Also you can find us at facebook at:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=29885056600
Thanks again for your interest in African wildlife conservation.
limpopocarnivores, on 03 Jun 2008
I think some sort of private sector control is great. Conservation initiatives MUST be economically stable if they are to be sustainable long term. Some care needs to be taken that the system is both economically and ecologically sound though as it may easy to swing too far in one direction. There are some places in SA that have many carnivores on small areas and just buy in more game every year for them to eat with the money generated by the tourism, but this isnt great either. I consider those places to be businesses, staight out, not conservation initiatives. Thats fine if they call themselves that, but I think you must call a spade a spade in those circumstances.
William, on 03 Jun 2008
I think this is great news.
It seems to me that this way there is more of a chance that local people will be able to benefit from the park and understand the value of having wildlife in Amboseli. Which it seems they definitely didn’t have before due to the animal spearings that recently made it into the news.
Out of interest, is there anyone who works in conservation in Kenya who believes that KWS do a good job?
Judy in CA, on 03 Jun 2008
This is shocking news. This park is one of Kenya’s jewels and home to the world’s most famous elephants. If this park is being abandoned by KWS, shame on the government. Obviously, KWS is not sharing tourist dollars with locals and now walking away? Amazing. If only Leakey could take charge of KWS like he did in the past. So much corruption and mismanagement now at the expense of wildlife. No tourist dollars at all if this park is destroyed. Kenya parks have lost so much in the past few years. Hearing about poisoned of lions in the Mara and now this. Horrible. I am so sad.
Judy in CA
zoe, on 04 Jun 2008
Am so sad to read all this. am sure there are so many people eyeing this jewel not even for their interest in animals but greed for cash.I wonder what local people genuinely interested in the welfare of the poor endagered animals can do about this? I feel so bad and helpless coz i predict big trouble for Amboseli.It’s so sad!
Xavier, on 05 Jun 2008
It is so sad and terrible to see how all those African governments, the more they are supposed to grow up the more corrupted they get and the worst their countries are getting…this is just desperating….they dont give a damm about their wildlife, cultural tribes heritages, people having no food at all….sad, sad, sad, and the worst is that they are proving to many, that once the western people are out, all they get is their own people acting worst and getting the highest rates of corruption ever…..please how can we all stop the most beautiful continent of the world from suicide ??!!
Wim, on 06 Jun 2008
If the worst happens, no one will be surprised.
If the best happens then that will be a wonderful thing, for Kenyans.
It’s not my land, it’s not my country.
All that Kenya requires of me is the contents of my wallet (tourism), and the benefit of my taxes (aid), it does not care about my opinion.
Kenyans are already earning the dividends and will continue to do so.
In the meantime it would be nice to hope that the Amboseli Elephant will not join the Amboseli Rhino.
Trackback URI | Comments RSS
Leave a Reply